[Tagging] Changing proposal process rules - RFC

[Lukas Richert]

The tagging list here seems to be dominated by ca. 10-20 ppl that weigh 
in on every topic, while the thousands of regular mappers aren't 
represented at all. Perhaps the proposal process could be better 
highlighted on the tag pages to get more input? I don't think making it 
even more exclusive necessarily means better tags - just an even more 
ingrown old-guard which slowly leads to a non-dynamic map.

On 05/01/2021 23:43, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 06:21, Tomas Straupis <tomasstraupis at gmail.com 
> <mailto:tomasstraupis at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>       As mentioned earlier either we get a considerable portion of mappers
>     (not wikians) to vote (which is practically impossible),
>
>
> Definitely agree there, & even just for discussing proposals, let 
> alone voting.
>
> December was a /very/ busy month on the tagging list, but only 93 
> people posted to it, & several of them were 1 post only
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210106/7bffb391/attachment.htm>