[Tagging] Changing proposal process rules - RFC

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Jan 6 13:13:16 UTC 2021




Jan 6, 2021, 13:45 by zelonewolf at gmail.com:

>> Rather than eliminating voices, we should be focused on attracting more 
>>  voters and more diverse perspectives, ideally at the RFC stage, before 
>>  the vote. Perhaps if we work on making tagging proposals more organized 
>>  and discoverable, we can lessen the burden on proposers to canvass for 
>>  votes (which can skew any vote because our communication channels are so 
>>  fragmented).
>>
>
> +1
>
> I dislike the fact that RFC and voting announcements are mixed with general discussion on the tagging list.  I think many people prefer not to subscribe to the list because it is high volume, but would be interested in subscribing to a list that only has RFC/vote announcements.  I would be in favor of a separate mailing list that people could subscribe to for just those announcements.  The key would be moderating that list in such a way that only announcements are posted there while discussion still happens on tagging in the usual way.
>
+1

It would also make easier to replicate announcements to other channels.

Though maybe page on wiki would be better for that?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210106/d92f1082/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list