[Tagging] Changing proposal process rules - RFC

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Jan 6 13:13:16 UTC 2021

Jan 6, 2021, 13:45 by zelonewolf at gmail.com:

>> Rather than eliminating voices, we should be focused on attracting more 
>>  voters and more diverse perspectives, ideally at the RFC stage, before 
>>  the vote. Perhaps if we work on making tagging proposals more organized 
>>  and discoverable, we can lessen the burden on proposers to canvass for 
>>  votes (which can skew any vote because our communication channels are so 
>>  fragmented).
> +1
> I dislike the fact that RFC and voting announcements are mixed with general discussion on the tagging list.  I think many people prefer not to subscribe to the list because it is high volume, but would be interested in subscribing to a list that only has RFC/vote announcements.  I would be in favor of a separate mailing list that people could subscribe to for just those announcements.  The key would be moderating that list in such a way that only announcements are posted there while discussion still happens on tagging in the usual way.

It would also make easier to replicate announcements to other channels.

Though maybe page on wiki would be better for that?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210106/d92f1082/attachment.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list