[Tagging] RFC 2 - addr:interval

[Brian M. Sperlongano]

I am opposed to the use of "odd", "even", "all", and anything else other
than a number used for intervals, and will vote against a proposal that
includes these unnecessary non-numeric tags.  The only thing that's needed
is a number to indicate the interval, and only when the interval is
something other than one.

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 11:48 PM Jmapb <jmapb at gmx.com> wrote:

> On 1/8/2021 10:43 AM, Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > Regarding the current interpretation of addr:housenumber, I am firmly
> > in the camp that its current definition of the tag is that of a single
> > housenumber and that those who already have been putting intervals into
> > it have been abusing it. So, while I'd be fine implementing the current
> > proposal of 'addr:interval' together with the limited version of
> > '<from>-<to>', Nominatim would then always interpret the absence of
> > addr:interval as a 'no' because that is the only interpretation that
> > is backward compatible with the current running definition.
>
>
> Thanks Sarah!
>
> I know I'm getting ahead of the story here, but hypothetically, given
> the tags addr:housenumber=1-3 and addr:interval=all, in addition to
> matching 1, 2, and 3, would Nominatim also still match the entire string
> "1-3"?
>
> Jason
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210109/164347a6/attachment.htm>