[Tagging] Deprecating operational_status and especially values such as operational_status=closed
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sun Jan 10 10:30:19 UTC 2021
Jan 10, 2021, 11:15 by marc_marc at mailo.com:
> Le 10.01.21 à 10:50, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :
>> Some objects like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3158114573
>> are tagged with tags that I consider very problematic: operational_status=closed
> well, according to the proposal about this tag,
> it's for temporary status, it is not a replacement for a life cycle tag.
> a fire hydrant that is not operational for 6 months because there is
> work on the pipeline 1km away, it is still a fire hydrant for the common
> contributors, and the hydrant itself is not broken or abandoned when it
> is temporarily not operational
if it is surveyable/verifiable:
why using disused: prefix would not be preferable?
if it not surveyable/verifiable:
how it is supposed to be mapped?
>> was already described as "now discouraged", I added
>> now also status=deprecated
> the interest of the operational_status tag was discussed in the fire
> hydrant proposal.
> Generally speaking, I find that the depreciation of a tag is in an
> absurd situation: on the one hand a proposal is easily rejected if it
> provides for the depreciation of a tag, on the other hand some
> contributors depreciate a tag before any discussion.
The difference is that anyone may revert
or change https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:operational_status%3Dclosed
while deprecation via proposal is much stronger
Note also that I specially started this thread to give opportunity
anyone opposing to such change.
Also, in case of any serious opposition I revert such changes
(I did it here for Key:operational_status right now).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging