[Tagging] Fw: Narrowing the application range of the smoothness tags
stefan.tauner at gmx.at
Thu Jan 14 11:44:07 UTC 2021
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:54:11 +0100
Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> Am Do., 14. Jan. 2021 um 11:36 Uhr schrieb Stefan Tauner <
> stefan.tauner at gmx.at>:
> > PS: I would never tag "smooth paving stones with seamless connections"
> > as excellent. At least none I have ever seen.
> here you are:
> (not paving stones actually, but stone and optimal smoothness)
Not paving stones as defined by the wiki IMHO - but I don't think we
have a better tagging for them.
If smoothness would be more widely used I guess they would fit
surface=paving_stones and smoothness=excellent, yes. However, I think
these should get a separate value, e.g., polished_stone.
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner
More information about the Tagging