[Tagging] Pedestrian access tagging
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Mon Jan 25 13:59:34 UTC 2021
I have not changed definition at all.
I only mmetioned that explicit tags may be more useful than expected.
Jan 25, 2021, 14:06 by voschix at gmail.com:
> Please do not change definition of widely-used tags.
> This creates only confusion. highway=motorway has to stay without changes. The correct way is to invite mappers to explicitly add foot|bicycle=yes in well-defined areas only.
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2021, 13:37 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging, <> tagging at openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>> Jan 25, 2021, 01:02 by >> baloo at ursamundi.org>> :
>>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 5:07 PM Brian M. Sperlongano <>>> zelonewolf at gmail.com>>> > wrote:
>>>> The wiki definition for highway=motorway says that foot=no (and others) are implied.
>>> Yeah, it might be time for the wiki to revisit that position since it varies enough to say that you should always tag the explicit mode access where known.
>> I added:
>> In some places areas some highway=motorway allow cyclists and pedestrians (on a shoulder).
>> It means that explicit foot=no, bicycle=no, shoulder=yes may be useful even if seemingly obvious.
>>  >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2021-January/thread.html#58857>> - about
>> pedestrian access on major roads, includes discussion of feasibility, legality and sanity of
>> pedestrian traffic on roads, up to and including motorways and revealed that explicit tagging of
>> pedestrian access may be useful even on motorways
>> Tagging mailing list
>> >> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging