[Tagging] Pedestrian access tagging
voschix at gmail.com
Wed Jan 27 16:32:45 UTC 2021
I fear we are making a lot of noise about nothing.
If we know the legal foot access situation for the road we map it.. This
should be based on the road category plus additional signs if they are
In any case any responsable pedestrian router would put an enormous penalty
for 80km/h traffic on a two-lane dual carriageway without shoulder or
sidepath (and maybe some addition for running on or close to military
ground.(in case of the first example)
If some suicidal jogger wants to run there nevertheless he can override the
router's instructions on his own risk.
Can we stop losing our time with this discussion.
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 19:59, Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner at gmx.at> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:31:12 +0100 (CET)
> Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/50.1050/19.8562
> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27150436
> > Not sure what is the legal status of pedestrian traffic, you could walk
> > grass along it without huge risk
> And if there is clear proof that this is actually done here (probably
> from the bus stations to that junction
> However, in this case I would say that mapping this path separately
> would be much better than relying on any tagging on the road way(s).
> 1: https://goo.gl/maps/LbgKL53EWU3RUHLXA
> Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging