[Tagging] consider website=www.openstreetmap.org to be OK

Alan Mackie aamackie at gmail.com
Sat Jan 30 02:54:20 UTC 2021


On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 15:39, Paul Norman via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> On 2021-01-26 9:10 a.m., Hauke Stieler wrote:
> > I encountered websites, that*only*  worked using either http or https.
> Meaning
> > I encountered websites that were unreachable using https and I also had
> some
> > that were unreachable using http.
>
>
> Do you have examples of this signage? I've seen plenty of shops that
> don't specify protocol in what they advertise as their website.
>
> This is the number 1 reason I don't think mappers should be forced to pick
a protocol. Map what's on the sign.

>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210129/de3c2d87/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list