[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Rejected - Reworking leisure=bathing_place

[gruebel2020 at online.de]

Voting on "Reworking leisure=bathing place" has ended. It was rejected 
with 9 votes against and 8 votes for (3 abstentions).

A large part of the votes against the proposal is because of the poor 
verifiability. In my opinion the places that are meant in this proposal 
are clear and verifiable. I had tried to set up many rules to make this 
clear for others. Apparently these were not sufficient or poorly defined 
by me.

I would revise the proposal in the future and propose it again. I am 
wondering if you have any ideas to improve the verifiability.
Maybe you have other images that could act as examples. I know several 
places, but unfortunately I have hardly taken any pictures of them so far.

I am still convinced that these locations have sufficient frequency and 
relevance to continue working on them.