[Tagging] Link route_marker to route

[Andy Townsend]

On 08/07/2021 13:26, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 at 11:33, Javier Sánchez Portero 
> <javiersanp at gmail.com <mailto:javiersanp at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hello.
>
>     Which one is the better way to link route markers
>     (tourism=information + information=route_marker) with their route
>     relation (type=route + route=hiking)? As guidepost is listed as a
>     role for members in the Relation:route wiki [1], Despite it has no
>     current uses (according to taginfo),
>
>
> There is something strange.
> I am using role=guidepost in hiking and bicycle route relations, 
> Taginfo seems not to pick them up.
> This <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8904322881> is one that I 
> inserted just this morning from Mapillary images
>
If I'm not misunderstanding taginfo*, I'm seeing 94k "guidepost" roles 
at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=guidepost#roles , and 2k 
"marker" and 1k "route_marker" 
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=guidepost#roles . Personally 
I've tended to use "marker", since many of the things I'm adding aren't 
guideposts in the conventional sense - see for example 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1996318 .

Best Regards,

Andy

* the extra 3 "role=guidepost" at 
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=guidepost#roles are a bit 
odd, but I suspect it's just a trailing space issue.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210708/4591fea2/attachment.htm>