[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tennis wall

[Michele Galimberti]

Martin, Yves and Bert, thanks for the explanation, I'll leave the reasoning
out and only write about what type of feature, node, way, relation, should
be used. Why ways and relations shouldn't be used is self-explanatory and
doesn't need an explanation in this case, I think.

Michele

Il giorno mer 14 lug 2021 alle ore 16:50 Bert -Araali- Van Opstal <
bert.araali.afritastic at gmail.com> ha scritto:

> My reservation was not as such for the use of a node, way, area or
> relation but about the verbose statement we can use aerial imagery and if
> the exact extend or location is unknown it's fine to map it with a node
> somewhere nearby. I interpret that as if I have no more verifiable local
> knowledge or verified it on the ground, and I can't or don't want to
> recognise or map it as a distinct area on aerial imagery, it's very much OK
> to throw in a node somewhere nearby, whatever that may mean. In or out of
> the actual area since I can't distinguish it from the aerial imagery.
> With respect to Micheles effort and boldness to write his first proposal,
> but leave that out.  Test however if the scheme can be used on all the
> element types, and if not describe it and explain why. Follow an
> elimination process instead of inclusion.
> @Michele, I will answer to the other requests in the coming days.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Bert Araali
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210714/a7717521/attachment.htm>