[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tennis wall

[Bert -Araali- Van Opstal]

My reservation was not as such for the use of a node, way, area or 
relation but about the verbose statement we can use aerial imagery and 
if the exact extend or location is unknown it's fine to map it with a 
node somewhere nearby. I interpret that as if I have no more verifiable 
local knowledge or verified it on the ground, and I can't or don't want 
to recognise or map it as a distinct area on aerial imagery, it's very 
much OK to throw in a node somewhere nearby, whatever that may mean. In 
or out of the actual area since I can't distinguish it from the aerial 
imagery.
With respect to Micheles effort and boldness to write his first 
proposal, but leave that out.  Test however if the scheme can be used on 
all the element types, and if not describe it and explain why. Follow an 
elimination process instead of inclusion.
@Michele, I will answer to the other requests in the coming days.

Greetings,

Bert Araali

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210714/9e6526a8/attachment.htm>