[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Shrubbery V2

[Vincent van Duijnhoven]

It can be me but I don't quite understand the problem you want to adress. How does this proposal make less sematic sense?

We just say that you can tag all shrubbery/scrub etc with natural=scrub and use cultivated to indicate to what extend it is cultivated which gives an indication of the wildness. THat allows people/data users to distiniguish between the more hegdes/shrubbery and the scrublands.

Vincent

________________________________
Van: Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com>
Verzonden: donderdag 15 juli 2021 10:20
Aan: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Onderwerp: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Shrubbery V2



On Thursday, 15 July 2021, Vincent van Duijnhoven <vvanduijnhoven at outlook.com<mailto:vvanduijnhoven at outlook.com>> wrote:
> Hello everybody.
> Jeroen and I changed the shrubbery proposal to be an extension to natural=scrub via the tag cultivated=*

I didn't think you could come up with something that made less semantic sense than your previous proposal but you have surpassed yourself.  Any amount of semantic confusion is better than the risk that somebody might confuse "scrub" and "shrubs", right?

--
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210715/8fb514cc/attachment.htm>