[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Shrubbery V2
Paul Allen
pla16021 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 15 18:48:12 UTC 2021
On Thursday, 15 July 2021, Vincent van Duijnhoven <
vvanduijnhoven at outlook.com> wrote:
> It can be me but I don't quite understand the problem you want to adress.
How does this proposal make less sematic sense?
Scrub is wild. Uncultivated. Adding cultivated to an uncultivated thing
is a contradiction in terms.
Landcover=shrubs describes it perfectly. Given the way we already abuse
natural to include cultivated plants, then natural=shrubs would also work.
But you refuse to accept either of those and instead keep coming up with
alternatives that others dislike. Around and around we go.
--
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210715/00775b40/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list