[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Shrubbery V2
Tobias Knerr
osm at tobias-knerr.de
Thu Jul 15 18:08:06 UTC 2021
On 15.07.21 18:01, Bert -Araali- Van Opstal wrote:
> Scrub:shape is the only remaining. Why again a namespaced tag for this
> purpose?
The set of values that make sense to describe scrub shape will likely
look different from the shape values used for, say, roofs or lights.
Using different keys (such as roof:shape and light:shape) makes it a lot
easier to document these different sets of values, to provide specific
examples, and to make the appropriate suggestions in editing tools.
So I think it the key is a good choice. Including some common values for
it in the proposal would make it even more useful, but I don't want to
ask for even more work. :) I hope this iteration of the proposal finally
goes through!
More information about the Tagging
mailing list