[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Shrubbery V2

[Jeroen Hoek]

On 15-07-2021 10:20, Paul Allen wrote:
> I didn't think you could come up with something that made less semantic
> sense than your previous proposal but you have surpassed yourself.
What is your intended effect of communicating like this? Do you find
that this kind of abusive language helps in discouraging other
contributors from tackling certain issues? Because this seems to be your
goal judging from your manner of communication.

Does it help in improving the OpenStreetMap project, and do you find
that this kind of behaviour should be an integral part of our community?

Because I don't.

From your wording I get the impression that this particular topic rubs
you the wrong way. You may want to consider disengaging from it instead,
leaving constructive criticism to others. I would find that much
preferable to being insulted for our efforts.

Jeroen Hoek

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210716/033756e0/attachment.sig>