[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Survey Markers

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Looks nice, thanks for sending it for review!

What is the difference between 
survey_point:structure=block
and
survey_point:structure=pillar
?

In Poland it is popular to have solid concrete block in shape
of pillar (visible height is about 4 times its width).

A bit similar to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Trig_Point_near_Wootton_Wawen.jpg
but with width at bottom the same as on top.

How it would be tagged?

survey_point:condition=not_visible - such markers should be deleted from OSM.
(description is 
> For marks embedded into the roadway, resealing the road may have covered the pin.
> Another example is if a building was constructed on top of the marker

Though I really appreciate

> survey_point:condition=destroyed is not proposed. If the survey marker no
> longer exists, it should be deleted from OSM.

Also +1 to

> This is outside the scope of this proposal

in rendering section.

BTW, what is the difference between
survey_point:structure=beacon man_made=survey_point
and
man_made=beacon
?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbeacon



Jun 4, 2021, 03:19 by K.y.l.e at outlook.co.nz:

>
> Hi all,
>
>
>  
>
>
> I’ve created a proposal for some tags related to survey markers: > https://wiki.osm.org/Proposed_features/Survey_Markers
>
>
>  
>
>
> I’d appreciate any thoughts or comments. Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page.
>
>
>  
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
> Kyle
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210604/be3a1620/attachment-0001.htm>