[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Survey Markers

Kyle Hensel K.y.l.e at outlook.co.nz
Fri Jun 4 04:11:02 UTC 2021


Hi, thanks for the feedback!

I had imagined that ‘pillar’ would be used for smaller/narrower structures, whereas I would consider your photo as a ‘block’.
But you’ve raised a good point, the distinction between pillar and block is somewhat arbitrary. Maybe they’re the same thing?

In any case, I’ve added some more examples to the wiki page.
Blocks/pillars are less common where I live, so it would be helpful to get more feedback on this


From: Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging<mailto:tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Friday, 4 June 2021 15:22
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools<mailto:tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Cc: Mateusz Konieczny<mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Survey Markers

Looks nice, thanks for sending it for review!

What is the difference between
survey_point:structure=block
and
survey_point:structure=pillar
?

In Poland it is popular to have solid concrete block in shape
of pillar (visible height is about 4 times its width).

A bit similar to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Trig_Point_near_Wootton_Wawen.jpg
but with width at bottom the same as on top.

How it would be tagged?

survey_point:condition=not_visible - such markers should be deleted from OSM.
(description is
> For marks embedded into the roadway, resealing the road may have covered the pin.
> Another example is if a building was constructed on top of the marker

Though I really appreciate

> survey_point:condition=destroyed is not proposed. If the survey marker no
> longer exists, it should be deleted from OSM.

Also +1 to

> This is outside the scope of this proposal

in rendering section.

BTW, what is the difference between
survey_point:structure=beacon man_made=survey_point
and
man_made=beacon
?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbeacon



Jun 4, 2021, 03:19 by K.y.l.e at outlook.co.nz:
Hi all,

I’ve created a proposal for some tags related to survey markers: https://wiki.osm.org/Proposed_features/Survey_Markers

I’d appreciate any thoughts or comments. Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page.

Best Regards,
Kyle


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210604/bb6e4553/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list