[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Survey Markers

Kyle Hensel K.y.l.e at outlook.co.nz
Fri Jun 4 04:58:37 UTC 2021

Hi, thanks for the feedback

I agree if the survey point still exists but just the structure has been removed, then this proposal would suggest updating the tags from `survey_point:structure=(whatever) ` to ` survey_point:structure=none`

> If you remove the point because it is no longer easily visible

That’s not what’s suggested – if a survey marker still exists but is not easily visible, the proposal is to tag it as `survey_point:condition=not_visible`

So this:


Is totally fine to map.

I was just proposing that if neither the survey point nor the structure exists anymore, then it should be removed from OSM.
This would only happen if a natural disaster or man_made earthworks removed all traces of it... do you think this is logical?

My rationale for suggesting this, is that OSM shouldn’t be used to map historical, non-existent things according to:

From: Michael Patrick<mailto:geodesy99 at gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, 4 June 2021 16:27
To: tagging at openstreetmap.org<mailto:tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Survey Markers

> > survey_point:condition=destroyed is not proposed. If the survey marker no longer exists, it should be deleted from OSM.

The survey point and observable evidence still exist, even though the monument may no longer be present. Monuments are 'lost' and 'recovered' all the time because of all sorts of events - vandalism, crime, natural disasters, land slips, forestry activity, etc.
There is a whole domain of archeological survey forensics, with techniques such as discontinuities in soil, presence of rust particles, dissecting trees to find blazes, and even collecting oral histories.
If you remove the point because it is no longer easily visible, then you are also obligated to remove many of the intermediary points that define the polylines of a lot of admin and park boundaries - those once had markers also ( especially near rivers ) and are now missing.

Michael Patrick

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210604/124ecf63/attachment.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list