[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Survey Markers

François Lacombe fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com
Fri Jun 4 15:07:19 UTC 2021


Dear all

I second Paul and previous comment regarding lifecycle prefixes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts

That would prevent survey_point:condition to be necessary and allow reuse
of survey_point for structure instead of more complex
survey_point:structure.
A single survey_point is better than two namespaced keys.
12k survey_point=* against 325k man_amde=survey_point sounds not enough to
state survey_point=* as established

Is it an import?
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/survey_point#chronology

All the best

François

Le ven. 4 juin 2021 à 15:55, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Am Fr., 4. Juni 2021 um 14:10 Uhr schrieb Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com>:
>
>> The organization "Geograph" exists to collate representative images of
>> every square kilometer of the British Isles.  Survey marks are popular.
>>
>
>
> the least representative item is popular ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210604/4e4d7075/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list