[Tagging] Is tag leisure=sports_hall suitable for riding halls?

[Hufkratzer]

On 10.06.2021 13:41, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 10 Jun 2021, at 11:47, Hufkratzer<hufkratzer at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>> What does "imply the building with [...] covered=yes" mean? Does it mean just to map one object with leisure=pitch + covered=yes?
> yes
> you could then add another object with building=roof on top, if you like

If I like? And if I don't add it, does it make sense?


>
>
>> If I understand page key:covered correctly, covered=yes means that an object (the pitch) is covereed by some *other* object (the roof or perhaps a bridge); it does not mean that one object (the pitch) has a roof included in itself
> I don’t see a problem. What do you mean by “has a roof included in itself”?
>
> Cheers Martin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

In 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2021-June/061725.html 
you listed  "imply the building with [...] covered=yes" like it would be 
an alternative for mapping the roof with building=roof, at least I had 
interpreted it like that. But if one just maps one object with 
leisure=pitch + covered=yes that is not a complete mapping of a covered 
pitch if there is no other object that coveres it. Right? That is what I 
meant and wanted to clarify. Some tags have covered=yes on their wiki 
pages under "Useful combination", e.g. leisure=picnic_table. I suspect 
that some people interpet covered=yes with "This feature includes a 
roof.", see 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=picnic_table#Beispiele.