[Tagging] Is tag leisure=sports_hall suitable for riding halls?

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

Am Do., 10. Juni 2021 um 14:20 Uhr schrieb Hufkratzer <hufkratzer at gmail.com
>:

> >> On 10 Jun 2021, at 11:47, Hufkratzer<hufkratzer at gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>
> >> What does "imply the building with [...] covered=yes" mean? Does it
> mean just to map one object with leisure=pitch + covered=yes?
> > yes
> > you could then add another object with building=roof on top, if you like
>
> If I like? And if I don't add it, does it make sense?
>
>

yes, you can also not add the building=* object and just add the pitch with
covered=yes. It would be sufficient for people looking for covered pitches,
or interested whether this specific pitch was covered, but you would not be
satisfied by most of the renderings, because they will not show the
(unmapped/implied) roof.



>
> In
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2021-June/061725.html
> you listed  "imply the building with [...] covered=yes" like it would be
> an alternative for mapping the roof with building=roof, at least I had
> interpreted it like that. But if one just maps one object with
> leisure=pitch + covered=yes that is not a complete mapping of a covered
> pitch if there is no other object that coveres it. Right?



IMHO leisure=pitch + covered=yes is a complete mapping of a covered pitch,
but personally I would also want to map the roof as such.



> That is what I
> meant and wanted to clarify. Some tags have covered=yes on their wiki
> pages under "Useful combination", e.g. leisure=picnic_table. I suspect
> that some people interpet covered=yes with "This feature includes a
> roof.", see
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=picnic_table#Beispiele.
>


covered may or may not imply a roof, you cannot tell from the tag alone,
what is the covering object. The tag covered=yes does not require that the
covering object is mapped.

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210611/a2d79d0b/attachment.htm>