[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - nudism:designated

[Volker Schmidt]

nudism=permissive
?

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 10:41, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Am Mo., 1. März 2021 um 10:05 Uhr schrieb Tamas Rell <tamasrell at gmail.com
> >:
>
>> may I propose adding the :designated value, to nudism: key.
>>
>> Here are the details:
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/nudism:designated
>>
>>
>
> the proposed tag is nudism=designated, and the definition is nudism is
> possible but one is not obligated (it wouldn't be strange if you wore a
> bathing suit, or some people will be naked, and others won't, right?). IMHO
> this would be a less strict value than nudism=yes, where the wiki states
> "allowed and generally expected", and this would be strange, because
> typically, "designated" is stronger than "yes". This is also in line what
> the nudism page states: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nudism
>
>> Other frequently used values:* designated* - intended for nudist use by
>> law or owner, something between "yes" and "obligatory"
>>
> Maybe I got your proposal wrong, but if the intention is for "designated"
> to be looser than yes (generally expected), I believe a different name for
> the value woul be required.
>
> Cheers
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210301/c01c69ad/attachment-0001.htm>