[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shrubbery

[Vincent van Duijnhoven]

But you actually remove that tagging confusion with this. Barrier=hedge on a non-closed line renders as a line, barrier=hedge + natural=shrubbery on an area renders as area hedge (solid fill), barrier=hedge + anyOtherAreaTag renders as line with the fill of the other area tag (e.g. landuse=grass).

Kind regards,
Vincent
________________________________
Van: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
Verzonden: zaterdag 6 maart 2021 15:16
Aan: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Onderwerp: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shrubbery



sent from a phone

> On 6 Mar 2021, at 13:01, Vincent van Duijnhoven <vvanduijnhoven at outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Because natural=shrubbery should by definition only be used on areas it can be used perfectly with barrier=hedge because alone, barrier=hedge renders as a line.


it would likely lead to having the outline also rendered as a linear hedge, because OpenStreetMap carto tries to work around people mixing linear and polygon features in the same object (like fence + amenity on the same object)


Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.openstreetmap.org%2Flistinfo%2Ftagging&data=04%7C01%7C%7C88ffa9a31a6d4643ca2208d8e0aae5d7%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637506371983432193%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=o03Ekn9EezwRTZU1ftHgJ8MK9R9dijqyBYcIZoJTJPc%3D&reserved=0
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210306/f973b2eb/attachment-0001.htm>