[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - trailblazed=poles;cairns
andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 8 04:15:57 UTC 2021
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 11:16, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> Am Mo., 8. März 2021 um 00:07 Uhr schrieb Peter Elderson <
> pelderson at gmail.com>:
>> trailblazed=yes on ways aims at simplicity.
>> trailblazed=<any other value> ruins the simplicity.
> if you check for trailblazed=!no you can have your simplicity back and
> people can add more detail about the kind of trailblaze without key bloat
Agreed, I don't think adding extra detail where the mapper chooses is going
to make things too complex.
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 10:07, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would think just to tag trailblazed=yes and, if you must, add
> colour=<green> and/or
> symbol=green_pole and/or
> to the ways of the trail where it applies.
i thought those tags were for documenting the wayfinding/route symbol used
on the trail markers, not for describing what the icon on a map rendering
ie. it would be wrong to say symbol=green_pole for green poles marking the
way, it would only be correct for posts which a green pole icon/symbol
painted on the post.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging