[Tagging] Proposed rewrite Of highway=track wiki page

Peter Elderson pelderson at gmail.com
Tue Mar 9 11:43:49 UTC 2021

To complicate matters, highway=track is also used to map how to cross
fields, using agricultural vehicles or jeeps and often permitted for
pedestrians.Usually the borders of the area are used, and the "track" may
or may not be visible depending on seasonal activity, multi-year
scheduling, overgrowth etc.
Pedestrian passage is also often mapped as highway=path. Such a path may
not be visible at all, you just know the places where you enter and leave
the area and usually follow the edges or a waterway, or a temporary track
made by a tractor, which probably disappears within a few weeks.

Peter Elderson

Op di 9 mrt. 2021 om 12:24 schreef Bert -Araali- Van Opstal <
bert.araali.afritastic at gmail.com>:

> On 09/03/2021 11:53, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> Mar 9, 2021, 03:23 by bert.araali.afritastic at gmail.com:
> On 09/03/2021 03:43, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:10 PM Bert -Araali- Van Opstal <
> bert.araali.afritastic at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why do we need unclassified ? Look at it from the point of view from an
> ant, walking on the tree.  The ant only knows that it walks on a road, it
> can't see that far to see if that road is a minor branch or a major branch,
> or even a shallow trunk.  It does however know that it is something that
> belongs to one of these, because sap runs through it.  It's like a mapper
> in the field without a satellite imagery. The ant can only find out what
> the road exactly is, by walking all the way from one end to the other, or
> by asking other ants who already acquired that knowledge.  In case they are
> not there, it should call it unclassified, to indicate it needs more
> information to assign a final judgement.
> That's not how it's used in OSM.  What you described is tagged in OSM as
> `highway=road`.  `highway=unclassified`, misleadingly, is a formal read
> classification in the UK - the road is classified as an 'unclassified
> road'.  What 'unclassified' means is that the road has a lower importance
> than 'tertiary', but is not 'residential', either because it is more
> important than the residential roads or because it serves another purpose
> such as accessing an industrial district. (If we were to start from a
> non-UK-centric perspective, we'd have probably chosen a tag like
> 'quaternary' to describe this in a more neutral fashion.)
> Maybe that's the most common way how it is interpreted in the West, having
> it's roots in the UK.  In Africa, it's not. We generally have very few or
> no highway=road. It also isn't considered a valid classification in Highway
> Tag Africa guidelines.
> Which ones?
> Looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
> it describes highway=unclassified as
> "Minor collector roads that allow travel and commerce from paths and
> residential
> roads to and between settlements. While generally not residential, there
> can be houses along the road."
> what matches
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
> It also has "if you're in doubt of what tag to use, use highway=road"
> "In case they are not there, it should call it unclassified" is
> mismatching general guidelines,
> general usage and Highway Tag Africa guidelines.
> Very well noticed Mateusz, I surely expressed or used wrong terms here.
> Sorry for the confusion, it shows how mixing up terms causes so much
> confusion.
> Unclassified on Highway tag Africa is defined as the gap or void filler,
> and yes it refers also to highway=road.  What I wanted to say is that using
> both of these as gap or void filler, especially by mixing in other terms,
> doesn't make it clear, causes conflict with the track concept. That
> "unclassified" is not clearly defined on Highway Tag Africa as a nice
> delineated scope. Does not improve practical use.
> "Minor collector roads" - what is a minor collector road ? Many attempts
> have been made to match the trunk/primary/secondary/tertiary
> classifications with the socio-economic classifications used by the
> National Authorities.  Most of them use the trunk-strategic-arterial /
> Collector / Feeder / local terms.  When you try to do so or mix these terms
> in the definitions of primary/Secondary/Tertiary, I end up with Trunk &
> Primary =strategic-arterial, Secondary = collector or feeder and tertiary =
> collector or feeder.  So far I haven't found any nice explanation in the
> OSM wiki what this feeder / collector difference is.  So you expect an OSM
> mapper to refer to the scientific literature or presume he must be an
> academic to be able to classify a road. As an open community I think we
> should be able and strive to do better.
> If I look at one definition (Wikipedia which by no means is always fully
> correct, but used by many as "the" reference) of a collector road it says:
> "A *collector road* or *distributor road* is a low-to-moderate-capacity
> road <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road> which serves to move traffic
> from local streets <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street> to arterial
> roads <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arterial_roads>. Unlike arterials,
> collector roads are designed to provide access to residential
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residential_area> properties. Rarely,
> jurisdictions differentiate major and minor collector roads, the former
> being generally wider and busier."
> All kinds of confusion grows here: low-to-moderate capacity, so it defines
> it in terms of throughput classification. As far as I am concerned any
> transport route that collects local traffic, no matter what it's capacity,
> width is a collector. Minor, do you mean minor in capacity, or narrower
> (mixing in it's phyical appearance). So here this creates lots of
> confusion, meaning paths cannot be collectors, narrow unimproved roads,
> tracks or streets whatever you want to call them are not collectors ?
> "are designed to provide access to residential properties", so this means
> there are no collectors in industrial or sparsely populated rural areas ?
> "travel and commerce from paths and residential roads". Now we mix in
> paths. So tracks never end on a collector ? A feeder never ends in a
> collector ? Is a feeder a secondary or a tertiary road in OSM, is a
> collector, used in it's definition a secondary or tertiary road ?
> The Highway Tag Africa says "While generally not residential, there can be
> houses along the road." But we have houses along many of our roads or
> tracks.  Which makes them by definition residential.  Contradicts again
> with collector etc... etc... etc... And then if with this definition it
> isn't clear we should use highway=road, which makes it even more unclear,
> because the western world defines most of our roads as tracks because of
> their physical appearance = unpaved, in many cases narrow.
> We included this to match the global "unclassified definition", which I
> thank Zeke to point me at that because it is much better, still not good
> enough (it mixes in motor vehicles, uses a mix of terms like streets, roads
> tracks, unpaved poor, rural etc...), we have some work to do, and for sure,
> Highway Tag Africa better fits our local infrastructure but is very poor in
> translating that form the global definition.
> I am hoping, by better defining our documentation and some changes left
> and right we can come to a more clear highway tagging.  One that doesn't
> need to much local variants, it only creates more confusion, and as in
> Africa many Westerners are mapping that don't even know or respect local
> guideline. There should be no need to completely bend and redefine local
> guidelines.
> I see good potential in the track as a base / tree concept for us to
> achieve this.
> Greetings,
> Bert Araali
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing listTagging at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210309/d6b0bdfc/attachment.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list