[Tagging] Is it OK to consider and describe landcover=water as deprecated?

Joseph Eisenberg joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com
Wed Mar 10 17:07:56 UTC 2021


Please update the proposal to make that clear. It is still listed.

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:05 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 10 Mar 2021, at 08:38, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
> tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> >
> > What is the benefit of landcover=water over using natural=water?
>
>
> maybe it’s not extremely relevant, but in the landcover proposal, water
> was excluded as natural=water seemed sufficient
>
>
> Cheers Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210310/65000f89/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list