[Tagging] Is it OK to consider and describe landcover=water as deprecated?
joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com
Wed Mar 10 17:07:56 UTC 2021
Please update the proposal to make that clear. It is still listed.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:05 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> sent from a phone
> > On 10 Mar 2021, at 08:38, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
> tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> > What is the benefit of landcover=water over using natural=water?
> maybe it’s not extremely relevant, but in the landcover proposal, water
> was excluded as natural=water seemed sufficient
> Cheers Martin
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging