[Tagging] Tanning Salons
clifford at snowandsnow.us
Sun Mar 14 18:35:36 UTC 2021
Simon - thanks for the feedback.
Would anyone care to offer some constructive feedback?
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:20 AM Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:
> This was already beaten to death the last time it was raised here.
> - tanning salons are not beauty parlours (shop=beauty)
> - they are, often self-service, tanning facilities, that if moved to
> anywhere else, should be moved to amenity
> - iD being wrong is not an argument
> - yes they don't seem to exist in the states, so I would suggest simply
> not to map them, which should be -real- easy.
> Am 14.03.2021 um 18:38 schrieb Clifford Snow:
> The wiki  recommends tagging tanning salons as leisure=tanning_salon
> but also shows similar tagging as shop=beauty + beauty=tanning. I don't
> believe that JOSM has a tagging preset for tanning while iD
> uses shop=beauty + beauty=tanning.
> I'd like to recommend depreciation of leisure=tanning_salon in favor of
> shop=beauty + beauty=tanning for two reasons. First is that shop=beauty +
> beauty=tanning has more uses and second and possibly more importantly
> tanning salons don't fit well with the majority of leisure values, like
> swimming pools, gardens, parks, golf courses.
>  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dtanning_salon
> OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
> Tagging mailing listTagging at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging