[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - boundary=forestry(_compartment) relations

[David Marchal]

Hello, there.

After an initial failed vote, this proposal was heavily reviewed and rewrited. Contested parts were removed or improved to better explain the proposal reasoning and its connections with current tagging practices (particularly the "Why not a landuse?" explaination). Comments have been addressed as much as possible without denaturing the proposal, which is now ready to return to RFC: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boundary%3Dforestry(_compartment)_relations

The talk page has been expurged of comments related to the first proposal, apart from the first vote comments, which are relevant to check the current proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/boundary%3Dforestry(_compartment)_relations

Awaiting your reviews,

Regards.
--
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210317/c4d86141/attachment.htm>