[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Big Bench

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 17 May 2021, at 18:54, Francesco Ansanelli <francians at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I may agree on brand=Big bench, it's a kind of brand in the end.


if Big bench is a brand the tag is fine, but it is not sufficient. You’d still need a tag to describe it. amenity=bench is not suitable IMHO, you have to climb on these and to use them, a certain ability is required.

Here’s an example for a big bench that is probably not from this company: https://moabitonline.de/738

Cheers Martin 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210517/126d5c41/attachment.htm>