[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Big Bench

Francesco Ansanelli francians at gmail.com
Tue May 18 04:53:51 UTC 2021


I copy here too:

Many people disagree about using or implying amenity=bench for such
features. If we need a more wide spread tagging scheme I may adapt my
proposal to:


+ giant_furniture=bench

+ brand=Big Bench

In this way, most of the example made by Schoschi, are suitable to be

May this be an acceptable compromise?

Il lun 17 mag 2021, 19:53 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> ha

> sent from a phone
> On 17 May 2021, at 18:54, Francesco Ansanelli <francians at gmail.com> wrote:
> I may agree on brand=Big bench, it's a kind of brand in the end.
> if Big bench is a brand the tag is fine, but it is not sufficient. You’d
> still need a tag to describe it. amenity=bench is not suitable IMHO, you
> have to climb on these and to use them, a certain ability is required.
> Here’s an example for a big bench that is probably not from this company:
> https://moabitonline.de/738
> Cheers Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210518/0f62d23e/attachment.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list