[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - value 'basic_network' for keys 'network:type', 'lcn' and 'lwn'

[Peter Elderson]

What (and who) exactly defines a route or a way as "basic network"?
Is it a kind of designation, or access, or preference?
How can it be verified on the road?

Fr gr Peter Elderson


Op za 13 nov. 2021 om 21:15 schreef JochenB <JochenB at wolke7.net>:

> Dear all,
>
> I would like to put my proposal for discussion to distinguish nameless
> connections in the cycle / hiking trail network from named routes and
> numbered node network connections.
>
> I suggest the following three tags for the nameless connections in the
> basic network:
> 'network:type=basic_network'
> for use at relations of type route
> 'lcn=basic_network' / 'lwn=basic_network'
> for temporary use on the ways as long as no route relation has been
> created yet.
>
> Here is the link to the proposal, written in english and german:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_feature/basic_network
>
> In the german forum we had various discussions on how to distinguish them.
>
> At first we thought about using relations with 'type=network' and
> 'route=bicycle' for the rest of the network. Thus they would be
> distinguishable from the relations with 'type = route', which are used
> for named routes. However, this does not fit with the other use of the
> network relations.
>
> Most popular was the idea of ​​tagging the nameless connections in a
> similar way to the numbered node networks (cycling by numbers). In
> numbered node networks, the connections are mapped using the relations
> 'type=route' with 'network:type=node_network'. Similarly, I would like
> to suggest using relations with 'type=route' and
> 'network:type=basic_network' for connections without their own name or
> symbol.
>
> I look forward to your advice or questions on the wiki talk page.
>
> Regards,
> JochenB
>
> (I apologize for the google-translated english)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211114/2dcad76f/attachment.htm>