[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - value 'basic_network' for keys 'network:type', 'lcn' and 'lwn'

[Peter Elderson]

True - but many designated cycling ways were not selected for the
destination-based standardized bicycle signposting.
So if you want to render the official standard cycling network, or for
preferential routing over this network, designated=yes is not sufficient.
You would need a tag to specifically set this official designation apart
from just designation.
I have the feeling that the official destination-based signposting also
uses ways which are not clearly designated for cycling. In Nederland that
is certainly the case.

Vr gr Peter Elderson


Op zo 21 nov. 2021 om 16:43 schreef Volker Schmidt <voschix at gmail.com>:

>
>
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 at 16:08, Zeke Farwell <ezekielf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> To me it sounds like this basic network idea is essentially the same as
>> tagging  bicycle=designated on ways.
>>
>
> Roughly yes.
> " bicycle <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle>=designated is
> applied where cycling is not only legal, but object is explicitly
> designated for use by cyclists."
> In many European countries this corresponds to the round blue road signs.
> In addition there are other roads that are particularly suitable for
> bicycles by virtue of the exclusion or restriction of other types of
> vehicular traffic or by virtue of the road layout. I would add to that also
> suitable crossings, in order to make to complete connectivity.
>
> This is the point I was trying to make earlier, the basic network roads
> can be found by navigation/routing devices by filtering - we don't need
> relations for that.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211121/7b7ddabc/attachment.htm>