[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - value 'basic_network' - cycle_network?

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

Am So., 28. Nov. 2021 um 01:52 Uhr schrieb Brian M. Sperlongano <
zelonewolf at gmail.com>:

> It seems that the challenge here is that you have all of these cycling
> ways which are certainly part of an interconnected network, though they are
> not part of any named and numbered route.
>
> I see this as very simple - we have a tag for this, network=lcn[1].  These
> ways are all part of a local cycling network, so tag them that way.
>


According to the wiki, the tag lcn=yes is intended for "Designates that a
road or path is part of a local Cycling Network route", i.e. it must be
part of a _route_.

Still we could have a tag bcn with a slightly different definition ("is
part of the basic cycling network" without the "route")

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211128/9c504e25/attachment.htm>