[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Multiple landuse

[Jeroen Hoek]

On 30-09-2021 23:58, Georg wrote:
> Overlapping areas are not clear as long they are the only approved way
> to express mixed landuses. They must be used for "one over the other" as
> well as "one mixed with the other" - so shall a renderer draw a small
> red area covering a large green area (XORed), or a red & green
> chessboard pattern (mixed/ORed)?
> 
> In contrast, after approval of the proposal, one polygon carrying both
> landuse=residential and landuse:secondary=retail is clearly a mix with
> clear precedence, and any case with two overlapping areas will then mean
> "XORed/covering".

And as an added bonus: most renderers can continue to limit themselves
to just the primary landuse, just as they do now when they render it.

Anyone analyzing landuse in an area (perhaps to create a landuse-centric
overview of a city) can use the secondary landuses to show mixed areas
as well.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211004/48bc346c/attachment.sig>