[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Fumarole

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Sep 14 10:23:54 UTC 2021


note: my knowledge here is poor, please do not treat me as someone who
knows much about fumaroles

1) I think it should be clarified how inactive fumaroles should be tagged
(with this tag? some other? not at all? In the last case people will likely
 anyway map them as natural=fumarole sooner or later)

It seems that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FunnelFumarole.png shows
inactive fumarole but I may be wrong

2) is restricting to nodes a good idea? How cases like 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Griggs_Camp.png
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fourpeaked-fumaroles-cyrus-read1.JPG
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kamakura-021_hg.jpg
would be tagged?

One node for each fumarole vent?




Sep 14, 2021, 08:34 by K.y.l.e at outlook.co.nz:

>
> Hi all,
>
>
>  
>
>
> I have revived the proposal for fumaroles, available here: >  https://wiki.osm.org/Proposed_features/fumarole
>
>
>  
>
>
> Any feedback would be appreciated. It seems like the original proposal in 2012 got no feedback, or the talk page has disappeared...
>
>
>  
>
>
> Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page.
>
>
>  
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Kyle
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210914/423cf201/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list