[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Fumarole
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Sep 14 18:01:39 UTC 2021
Sep 14, 2021, 15:15 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:
> sent from a phone
>> On 14 Sep 2021, at 12:29, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>> 1) I think it should be clarified how inactive fumaroles should be tagged
>> (with this tag? some other? not at all? In the last case people will likely
>> anyway map them as natural=fumarole sooner or later)
> what do you mean by inactive fumarole? If a fumarole is a place where steam and gases emit through the crust of the earth, are all other places where the crust in not permeable inactive fumaroles?
Places which are clearly recognizable/signed as a place where steam/gas was emitted
but is not anymore.
If I understand it right, then https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FunnelFumarole.png
is example of such object
> By the currently proposed definition, there is no risk of inactive fumaroles getting the tag.
natural=tree used to be clearly defined as "Lone or significant tree"
(no idea is it likely that natural=fumarole would end in the same way)
>> 2) is restricting to nodes a good idea? How cases like
>> would be tagged?
> right, from reading the WP article I also got the impression that this phenomenon can occur along longer cracks, so ways seem suitable in some cases, as might areas.
I also thought about tagging fumarole groups/fields as an area.
Especially as such structures may be dangerous to survey.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging