[Tagging] no:XX versus not:XX for non-existing objects
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Mon Sep 20 08:31:29 UTC 2021
On 19/9/21 8:39 pm, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote:
> private;
> you need to go to the person who wrote it.
There is no 'need'.
It would be a curtsy, but it is not a requirement.
> Sunday, September 19, 2021 3:25 AM -05:00 from Jan Michel
> <jan at mueschelsoft.de>:
> Dear all,
> we currently have two different prefixes for things that are not what
> they seem to be or might have been:
>
> no:XX
> - 200 uses with 20 different keys
> - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:no
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:no>:
> - https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=no%3A
> <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=no%3A>
>
> not:XX
> - 20k uses with 200 different keys
> - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:not
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:not>:
> - https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=not%3A
> <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=not%3A>
>
> Both Wiki pages read almost identical, with slightly different
> stress on objects that don't exist any more but are still visible on
> images versus objects that never existed but could be assumed to be
> there.
>
> I think the current situation with two almost identical tags is a bit
> unfortunate and should be resolved.
> I see two possible options here:
>
> - define the different scopes of the two tags more clearly and stress
> the differences on both Wiki pages.
>
> - mark the less used 'no:' prefix as deprecated and favor the quite
> common 'not:' prefix instead.
>
>
>
> Jan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org </compose?To=Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210920/0de0926a/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list