[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Multiple landuse

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Sep 29 14:14:08 UTC 2021




Sep 29, 2021, 13:33 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:

> Am Di., 28. Sept. 2021 um 21:23 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <> tagging at openstreetmap.org> >:
>
>> 2) I am not convinced at all that 
>> landuse:secondary=*, landuse:tertiary=*, landuse:quaternary=*
>> is better than overlapping landuses
>>
>
>
> there is a difference in semantics though, secondary, tertiary, etc. indicate a hierarchy, while overlapping landuse objects don't. Not implying that one is worse than the other, but they aren't equivalent.
>
And it is partially my reason!

With one landuse dominating - map just one.

With multiple landuse applying clearly at once - map overlapping areas.

In case where you are unable to select primary one, landuse:secondary
would be even more problematic than overlapping landuses or selecting
just one.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210929/2aa85511/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list