[Tagging] Docks - Change to use the natural/water schema?

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Mon Apr 4 07:04:18 UTC 2022




Apr 3, 2022, 17:07 by davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com:

>
>
> On 01/04/2022 22:19, Mateusz Konieczny      via Tagging wrote:
>
>> waterway=* have several water=related objects which are not        water
>>
>
> That's not a reason not to fix waterway=dock
>   
>
What you proposed is not fixing it (at least in my opinion),
and in my opinion it makes things worse.

I also do not consider 
"waterway=* have several water=related objects which are not        water"
as a problem.

In particular dry docks and various form of portage
( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portage ) may be considered as part
of waterways without being a water.


>> water=* accompanies natural=water
>>
>
> Yes, and your point is?
>  
>
That using it for objects which are not natural=water is a bad idea.
Docs are such case. 

>> all docks are water-related, not all of them are        natural=water objects
>>
>
> There are many 'none natural' objects tagged as natural. Reservoirs    for instance. It's the water that's classed as natural, not its    container.
>  
>
Yes, but deliberately introducing use of water=* for things which are not
natural=water just makes things worse without any benefit.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220404/f1dcd6fa/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list