[Tagging] Docks - Change to use the natural/water schema?
Dave F
davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
Tue Apr 19 17:20:43 UTC 2022
On 03/04/2022 22:56, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> The problem with waterway=dock is that it is used for several
> different things, only some of which are normally areas of inland water.
I fail to see how location relates to the dock tag.
"An enclosed area of water for ships and boats within which the height
of the water can be managed, or a dry dock" applies to water, anywhere.
>
> Recall that natural=water is used for the area of "Any inland body of
> water" But this is not consistent with how waterway=dock is used:
"inland" is so subjective.
OSM tagging system is based on an object's description/purpose rather
than location.
>
> 1) many waterway=dock areas are part of the sea,
Many are not:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1hsC
In fact, all are "not part of the sea". They've all been constructed
"inland"
> because the tag is often used to tag a named part of a harbor, such as
> a slip or berth or quay, or for marines (normally tagged leisure=marina)
Then those areas have been mis-tagged & should be amended.
> This was not the original intention of use for waterway=dock but it is
> quite common (for example, see the usage around Venice Italy).
Note how all are "inland", both from the coast *and* man made, cut out
of land.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1hsD
> Such areas should not get the tag natural=water because they should be
> outside of the natural=coastline.
Not according to your examples..
> Also many are mapped only as a node because they do not have clearly
> defined outer limits, but natural=water must be mapped as an area.
>
> 2) ...though they should mostly be re-tagged as man_made=pier
Then why mention them?
>
> 3) dry docks and floating (dry) docks are tagged with waterway=dock
> and dock=drydock / floating.
As can water=dock
> A floating dock is certainly not an area of water, is it like a kind
> of barge or vessel which is used to lift boats or ships out of the
> water for servicing. And a dry dock appears to be dry land 99% of the
> time in most cases.
For above hull repairs there's no requirement to drain the water.
> Some could be considered an intermittent water area like an
> ephemeral lake or a flood control basin, but only if the dry dock is
> still functional.
So water=dock can use the intermittent tag if desired, but it's hardly
essential - a dock, by definition,
>
> 4) Tidal docks, which are also confusingly called "floating" docks or
> harbours in parts of the UK, fit the current definition of "an
> enclosed area of water for ships and other craft within which the
> height of the water can be managed" by the use of tidal gates or
> locks. This could be tagged as natural=water plus a new tag like
> water=tidal_dock
> 5) The term "dock" is also used for ship or boat yards, which may
> contain dry docks but also areas of dry land used for shipbuilding,
> repair and maintenance.
No. They're different entities. A boatyard make contain a dock, but not
the other way around.
DaveF
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220419/c90f69cc/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list