[Tagging] changeset tag for automated/mecanical edit

[Warin]

On 23/8/22 20:17, Marc_marc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> a work had been done a few years ago to make
> an inventory of all changeset tags in use [1]
>
> for mecanical/autoamted edit, There are at least two that deserve
> a better consensus:
>
> 1) a tag that describe that's is a mecanical edit
> I have see mecanical=yes reviwed=no type=mecanical
> what's did you think ? I like the idea of type
> but not the word type itself (due to its use for relation)


edit_method=mechanical/automated/human/*

>
> 2) a tag that describe the scope of the edit
> I was using scope=* and I also see is_in
> is this tag better to describe the scope ?

edit_scope=*


???

The work 'edit' at the start would avoid any confusion with other uses. 
Instead of the underscore a full colon could be used...