[Tagging] fix the suggestion for replacement for pipeline=marker into marker=* + subject=pipeline ?

[Peter Elderson]

Hi,

The idea looks very much okay to me, but I am not into utility markers at
all, so I didn't feel safe to contribute.

Just hiking trail symbol markings, which are not usually mapped as features
in themselves. I hope this proposal does not extend to those.

I do encounter a lot of markers on my hiking sprees, usually I don't know
what they indicate, and with your proposed tagging I can map them.
subject=* sounds too vague/broad to me.
It's probably because there are markers for other things than utilities.

Fr gr Peter Elderson


Op wo 31 aug. 2022 om 10:29 schreef Marc_marc <marc_marc at mailo.com>:

> any opinion?
>
> Le 11.08.22 à 12:01, Marc_marc a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > on the talk-fr list, I raised the inconsistency around
> > the deprecated tag pipeline=marker
> >
> > this tag contains 2 pieces of information:
> > - there is a marker
> > - it is relative to a pipeline
> >
> > the deprecated tags page proposes to replace it with
> > - marker=* : it's a marker of this form
> > - utility=* to describe the user of the pipeline content
> >
> > although useful to anyone, this second tag is an addition; this
> > data is not present in the deprecated tag.
> > and conversely, the information that it is relative to a pipeline
> > is lost in the suggestion for replacement.
> >
> > we came to the idea that it would be useful to fix the suggestion
> > for replacement for pipeline=marker into marker=* + subject=pipeline
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Marc
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220831/9e588a29/attachment.htm>