[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Gender
Illia Marchenko
illiamarchenko92 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 17 22:16:11 UTC 2022
Thanks for feedback!
Marc_marc <marc_marc at mailo.com>:
> Le 17.12.22 à 21:58, Illia Marchenko a écrit :
> > Gender proposal is ready for voting. After the previous vote, this
> > proposal has been reworked. I plan to start voting in a few days.
> >
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Gender
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Gender
> >
>
> Isn't it good practice to have an RFC after the last change
> (i.e. today) ?
>
RFC isn't voting.
Always pushing to go faster only leads to no votes and starting over-
> in skimming the proposal, i didn't understand how redefining the meaning
> of 3 tags will remove the ambiguity of one of the (unisex=yes)
>
This proposal isn't limited to clarification of the unisex=yes.
Don't expect all contributors to read the counter-intuitive explanations
> you offer.
> a =segrated =not-segrated value would be much more intuitive
>
I added female=separate and male=separate to the proposal.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221218/fb2c0a42/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list