[Tagging] An after-burner meta-discussion

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

Am Di., 15. Feb. 2022 um 11:37 Uhr schrieb David Marchal via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org>:

> I simply wanted to add that the "humming" might be achieve with the Emoji
> system I talked about: the contributor/chair/moderator wanting a hum on a
> point asks a question and tell "React with 👍 or 👎 (or with 1 to 5 ⭐, ⭐
> meaning you strongly disagree, ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ meaning that you strongly agree) to
> see where we can try to lead this debate". The RFC you pointed gives sound
> advice about how to manage this result.



Some time ago, I proposed to add a simple rating system for wiki edits
(thumbs up / thumbs down), so that consensus with edits could be measured
and authors could gain or loose reputation. Later a system was implemented
which allows to thank the author of a wiki edit. Unfortunately, as stats
are not visible (you cannot see how many thanks an authors has received,
neither in total nor for a specific edit, nor does it seem the authors
themselves are notified, or maybe nobody ever thanked me), and as there is
still no way to express dissent with an edit (apart from discussing it and
or reverting it), it currently does not seem to do anything.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dieterdreist/diary/44271

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220215/1647eefd/attachment.htm>