[Tagging] An after-burner meta-discussion

[Brian M. Sperlongano]

I use the "thank" feature on the wiki frequently, especially when someone
fixes a typo on something I add.  It does notify me, via wiki alert and
email when I've been thanked.

On Tue, Feb 15, 2022, 6:52 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> Am Di., 15. Feb. 2022 um 11:37 Uhr schrieb David Marchal via Tagging <
> tagging at openstreetmap.org>:
>
>> I simply wanted to add that the "humming" might be achieve with the Emoji
>> system I talked about: the contributor/chair/moderator wanting a hum on a
>> point asks a question and tell "React with 👍 or 👎 (or with 1 to 5 ⭐, ⭐
>> meaning you strongly disagree, ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ meaning that you strongly agree) to
>> see where we can try to lead this debate". The RFC you pointed gives sound
>> advice about how to manage this result.
>
>
>
> Some time ago, I proposed to add a simple rating system for wiki edits
> (thumbs up / thumbs down), so that consensus with edits could be measured
> and authors could gain or loose reputation. Later a system was implemented
> which allows to thank the author of a wiki edit. Unfortunately, as stats
> are not visible (you cannot see how many thanks an authors has received,
> neither in total nor for a specific edit, nor does it seem the authors
> themselves are notified, or maybe nobody ever thanked me), and as there is
> still no way to express dissent with an edit (apart from discussing it and
> or reverting it), it currently does not seem to do anything.
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dieterdreist/diary/44271
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220215/7f25015b/attachment.htm>