[Tagging] Route names, and section order in superroutes

[Yves]

Osm-carto used to display (pre-cartocss?) each and every relations route name.
It is hopefully no longer the case.
Yves 

Le 19 février 2022 11:59:49 GMT+01:00, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> a écrit :
>
>
>
>Feb 18, 2022, 13:04 by pelderson at gmail.com:
>
>> We have talked in the past about the name tag in route names. It often contains non-name elements. This appears to be driven by how people want to see the routes displayed in lists. 
>> From, To, Via, Ref, Purpose, Region, and Part numbers are popular elements. These elements are layed out to produce alphabetically ordered and 'pretty print' route list in applications and maintenance tools.
>> Understandable, but not conform the 'name=just the name' principle, which is important for clean data and for a.o. Nominatim. 
>>  
>> To clean this up, From, To, Via, Ref can go in the well-known from=*, via=*, to=*, and ref=* tags. Region, Purpose (e.g. "German part of the GR5"), can be moved to description=*.
>>
>+1, editors can display identifiers of relations based on such tags
>Fake name tags should not be added, this lowers quality of data and is 
>form of mistagging for renderer.
>
>> I think OSM Carto uses displays the name tag and object Id for all relations.
>>
>As far as I remember, only relations displayed by OSM Carto are 
>(1) areas (=multipolygons) and their ids are not displayed at all.
>(2) boundary relations (basically, also areas) - and their ids are not displayed at all
>
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Standard_tile_layer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220219/d524c579/attachment.htm>