[Tagging] Traffic signal warning lights?
Minh Nguyen
minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
Thu Jan 13 21:20:55 UTC 2022
Vào lúc 01:47 2022-01-13, Tom Pfeifer đã viết:
> On 13.01.2022 09:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>> On 13 Jan 2022, at 00:57, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> I'm thinking of highway=traffic_signals +
>>> traffic_signals=advance_warning.
>>
>>
>> I agree that they aren’t traffic signals in the sense of the
>> OpenStreetMap tag, that’s why they shouldn’t get the
>> highway=traffic_signals tag, regardless of additional tags.
>
> Indeed highway=traffic_signals is unsuitable, since it breaks backward
> compatibility.
>
> When a routing engine encounters highway=traffic_signals it calculates
> an average waiting time,
> and so far it did not have to evaluate sub-tagging for that task.
>
> Thus a different high-level value is needed for signals that create
> driver attention but do not influence driving time.
The parallel discussion on the wiki brought up flashing_lights=yes and
crossing:light=yes. They're slightly orthogonal, but I think both
examples given so far would be covered by one or the other. (In one of
the examples, flashing_lights=yes would be tagged on the traffic sign
node, not the intersection that it warns about.)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Traffic_signal_warning_lights
--
minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
More information about the Tagging
mailing list