[Tagging] ISCED (2011) tagging for schools

[Robin Burek]

"Toggenburger Lukas" Lukas.Toggenburger at fhgr.ch – 23. Januar 2022 21:32
> So, how about doing the following?
>
> Step 1: Setup a proposal
> Step 2: Apply new tagging that makes clear what level was used
>
> I propose to focus on step 1 for now.

+1

> - I'd also prefer isced:2011:level=* over the other order

I'm not. Why? I is clear. There is only one ISCED-Level. The 1997 or 2011 only indicates the version. However, the latest version remains compulsorily valid and has allowed the old version to expire.

> - There are other ISCED levels (besides the ISCED-P level we are talking about) one could want to map, ISCED-A, ISCED-F, maybe others. Would this need/justify a rename of isced:2011:level=* (or similar) to something like isced:2011:level_p=* ?

Yes, there are some other ISCED-Level; But these don't rely to the amenity at itself.
ISCED-A classifies a degree you have got. So it is not relevant to a school or something else.
ISCED-P is the main "programm"-classification that is offerd by an educational amenity. Normaly the isced-a of your degree match with the isced-p of the school/university ;)
And ISCED-F (after ISCED-F:2013) is the field. This could be intresting to add then a isced_f:level too.

> - Would usage of the dash interval indicator in a interval "0-4" include level 4? Dijkstra would say no.
> - Should the dash interval indicator be disallowed for multi-digit levels?
> - Would the usage of the dash make it harder for editors to use presets or otherwise create problems?

Because this confusion, I would oppose this interval-writing. Only semikolons should be allowed.