[Tagging] graves and relations
Minh Nguyen
minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
Mon Jan 24 05:16:04 UTC 2022
Vào lúc 14:16 2022-01-23, Martin Koppenhoefer đã viết:
> Are there really memorials for so many people with wikidata entries that a relation is technically required? Almost nobody (compared to the total number, every village and every quarter has its world war memorial) on these memorials has a wikidata object, nor is it likely they will ever get one.
In principle, a Wikidata item could be created about any clearly marked
burial site: a mere Find a Grave memorial ID [1] is enough to satisfy
Wikidata's notability guidelines [2], and I wouldn't be surprised if
someone is running a bot to automatically synchronize the two sites.
Find a Grave only requires a photo of the grave for verification;
however, its coverage probably varies greatly by region, given the level
of effort required.
Even if a person has their own Wikidata item, that in itself isn't a
reason to create a relation for them. If we really need to distinguish
between the person and their burial site, then the burial site can be
tagged with buried:wikidata=*. Each memorial to the person can be
separately tagged with subject:wikidata=*.
The only person relation I've personally encountered [3] was added
before Wikidata existed and has only ever been touched by continent- or
world-spanning edits, mostly in a long-running tug-of-war between people
who think this type of relation should exist and those who don't. I must
admit that, when I first heard of this relation type, I thought it was
some kind of scheme for tracking the distribution of relics...
[1] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P535
[2] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:PermanentLink/1496779160#2
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2511501/history
--
minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
More information about the Tagging
mailing list